{"id":199626,"date":"2022-08-11T12:05:39","date_gmt":"2022-08-11T16:05:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/?post_type=id_research&p=199626"},"modified":"2023-03-15T10:00:48","modified_gmt":"2023-03-15T14:00:48","slug":"interior-design-unveils-the-2022-rising-giants","status":"publish","type":"id_research","link":"https:\/\/interiordesign.net\/research\/interior-design-unveils-the-2022-rising-giants\/","title":{"rendered":"Interior Design Unveils the 2022 Rising Giants"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\"a<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

August 11, 2022<\/p>\n\n\n

Words: <\/span>Mike Zimmerman<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Interior Design Unveils the 2022 Rising Giants<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

If you think of the pandemic as a roller\u00adcoaster, then the 2022 business trend data for the Interior Design<\/em> Rising Giants, the second 100 largest firms, would be a popular one. Like any good coaster, the initial drop was a doozy, with total fees heading down from $521 million in 2019 to $314 million in 2020 as COVID-19 hit the economy. Now, however, it looks like the rollercoaster has troughed and is heading up the next ramp. Total fees for 2021 came in at $354 million, a healthy 13 percent bump. And the Rising Giants forecast the coming year at $416 million, continuing the upward surge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Rankings 2022<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n\n wdt_ID<\/th> 2022 Rank<\/th> Firm<\/th> HQ Location<\/th> Design Fees (in millions)<\/th> Value (in millions)<\/th> Sq. Ft. (in millions)<\/th> ID staff<\/th> 2021 Rank<\/th> <\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
1<\/td>\n 1<\/td>\n Planning, Design, Research Corporation<\/a><\/td>\n Houston<\/td>\n 8.20<\/td>\n 280.00<\/td>\n 2.30<\/td>\n 60<\/td>\n 88<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\n 2<\/td>\n StudioSIX5<\/a><\/td>\n Austin<\/td>\n 7.80<\/td>\n 250.00<\/td>\n 6.00<\/td>\n 49<\/td>\n 108<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\n 3<\/td>\n DiLeonardo International<\/a><\/td>\n Warwick<\/td>\n 7.80<\/td>\n 0.00<\/td>\n 0.00<\/td>\n 65<\/td>\n new<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\n 4<\/td>\n DesignAgency<\/a><\/td>\n Toronto<\/td>\n 7.60<\/td>\n 0.00<\/td>\n <\/td>\n 72<\/td>\n 112<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\n 5<\/td>\n Dyer Brown<\/a><\/td>\n Boston<\/td>\n 7.20<\/td>\n 250.00<\/td>\n 3.20<\/td>\n 28<\/td>\n 104<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\n 6<\/td>\n Rule Joy Trammell Rubio<\/a><\/td>\n Atlanta<\/td>\n 7.10<\/td>\n 50.00<\/td>\n <\/td>\n 58<\/td>\n new<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\n 7<\/td>\n Kenneth Park Architects<\/a><\/td>\n New York<\/td>\n 7.00<\/td>\n 10.00<\/td>\n 0.50<\/td>\n 25<\/td>\n 106<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\n 8<\/td>\n Architecture, Incorporated<\/a><\/td>\n Reston<\/td>\n 6.90<\/td>\n 91.50<\/td>\n 0.80<\/td>\n 12<\/td>\n 101<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n Alliance Architecture<\/a><\/td>\n Durham<\/td>\n 6.80<\/td>\n 150.00<\/td>\n <\/td>\n 28<\/td>\n new<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\n 10<\/td>\n Smallwood<\/a><\/td>\n Atlanta<\/td>\n 6.70<\/td>\n 0.00<\/td>\n <\/td>\n 39<\/td>\n 83<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody> \n\n \n \n \n <\/table>\n\n<\/div>